<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
  xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
  xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
		<title>Bishop & Sewell LLP News (full text)</title>
		<link>http://www.bishopandsewell.co.uk/</link>
		<description>A recent Bishop & Sewell LLP news story feed in RSS2.0</description>
		<language>en-gb</language>
		<item>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<title><![CDATA[Benefits in kind]]></title>
			<link>http://www.bishopandsewell.co.uk/news.php?id=000043</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>  <w:WordDocument>   <w:View>Normal</w:View>   <w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom>   <w:PunctuationKerning/>   <w:ValidateAgainstSchemas/>   <w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>false</w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>   <w:IgnoreMixedContent>false</w:IgnoreMixedContent>   <w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>false</w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>   <w:Compatibility>    <w:BreakWrappedTables/>    <w:SnapToGridInCell/>    <w:WrapTextWithPunct/>    <w:UseAsianBreakRules/>    <w:DontGrowAutofit/>   </w:Compatibility>   <w:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</w:BrowserLevel>  </w:WordDocument> </xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>  <w:LatentStyles DefLockedState="false" LatentStyleCount="156">  </w:LatentStyles> </xml><![endif]--> <!--  /* Style Definitions */  p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal 	{mso-style-parent:""; 	margin:0cm; 	margin-bottom:.0001pt; 	mso-pagination:widow-orphan; 	font-size:12.0pt; 	mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt; 	font-family:""; 	mso-fareast-font-family:""; 	mso-ansi-language:EN-GB;} @page Section1 	{size:612.0pt 792.0pt; 	margin:72.0pt 90.0pt 72.0pt 90.0pt; 	mso-header-margin:36.0pt; 	mso-footer-margin:36.0pt; 	mso-paper-source:0;} div.Section1 	{page:Section1;} --> <!--[if gte mso 10]> <style>  /* Style Definitions */  table.MsoNormalTable 	{mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; 	mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; 	mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; 	mso-style-noshow:yes; 	mso-style-parent:""; 	mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; 	mso-para-margin:0cm; 	mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; 	mso-pagination:widow-orphan; 	font-size:10.0pt; 	font-family:""; 	mso-ansi-language:#0400; 	mso-fareast-language:#0400; 	mso-bidi-language:#0400;} </style> <![endif]-->  <p>How all employers, company directors and HR executives can make good use of benefits in kind with our Wills service. </p>  <!-- attempted to clean MS html formatting -->]]></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<title><![CDATA[Important Leasehold Reform Case]]></title>
			<link>http://www.bishopandsewell.co.uk/news.php?id=000042</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<span class="089420712-15052008">Mark Chick, a partner at Bishop &amp; Sewell LLP takes a look at  the recent House of Lords judgement in the case of Majorstake v Curtis, the  first 1993 Act case to be considered by the House of Lords in an article which  appears in issue 39 of 'News on The Block'...</span><span class="452362615-10032008"><br /> <br /> </span>]]></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<title><![CDATA[Corporate Deals Update]]></title>
			<link>http://www.bishopandsewell.co.uk/news.php?id=000041</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The Company Commercial team at Bishop and Sewell LLP have recently completed 3 corporate deals. <br /><br /><br />To read more click on the link below:<br />]]></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<title><![CDATA[Testimonial From An Enthusiastic Corporate Client]]></title>
			<link>http://www.bishopandsewell.co.uk/news.php?id=000036</link>
			<description><![CDATA[  <p class="MsoNormal">Chris Holme has been advising us for many years and true to form, spearheaded the BTA within an extremely tight time frame. His characteristic dominant role was matched by the fantastic efforts of the rest of this team in particular Rashpal, Sophie and Chandresh who together enabled our business to maximise the sale price before the end of the tax year.</p>    <p class="MsoNormal">We were delighted for Chris Holme when he moved to Bishop &amp; Sewell and told us how progressive and forward thinking a law firm they were. Having completed the sale of our business within 2 and a half weeks, we now appreciate what he meant. The whole team at Bishop &amp; Sewell should also take pride in their contribution to the success of the deal in particular, Rashpal, Sophie and Chandresh. We are extremely pleased that we entrusted the disposal of our business to Chris and grateful for the care and attention that everyone at Bishop &amp; Sewell took in the process. We shall (as always) be happy to recommend Chris and his team to others.</p>  ]]></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<title><![CDATA[Inheritance tax]]></title>
			<link>http://www.bishopandsewell.co.uk/news.php?id=000035</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<span class="452362615-10032008"><strong>Inheritance Tax - don't believe all you read!</strong> Inheritance Tax planning is essential for almost everyone - as the latest article from Andrew Murray of our Personal Wealth, Estates Tax and Trusts team shows:<br /><br />Click below to download:<strong><em><br /></em></strong></span>]]></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<title><![CDATA[Not made a Will?]]></title>
			<link>http://www.bishopandsewell.co.uk/news.php?id=000032</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<strong>In this world nothing is certain but death and taxes&rdquo;</strong> said Benjamin Franklin &ndash; over two centuries later this holds as true.<br /><br />Whether we approve of it or not, Inheritance Tax is here to stay for the foreseeable future but whereas in the past it only affected the estates of those at least moderately wealthy, now with UK average house prices at &pound;200,000 and London average property prices at over &pound;300,000, Inheritance Tax applies to the majority of homeowner&rsquo;s estates. <br /><br />As a general principle, if you want to pay Inheritance Tax, then don&rsquo;t write a Will. It&rsquo;s the best and fastest way to ensure that you make the maximum contribution to government coffers when you die. If, on the other hand, you would like to pass the maximum amount of your estate to family and friends, plan ahead and make a valid and up to date Will. <br /><br />Nor can you rely on a Will made some years ago &ndash; tax legislation has been changing and increasing estate liabilities at a pace not seen since the modern legislative format and it is imperative that you review your Will regularly to avoid unnecessary tax traps.<br /><br />What risks are you running by not making a Will?<br /><br />Dying without a Will (Intestate) means that your estate will pass in accordance with the Administration of Estates Act 1925 &ndash; and that covers your property, your personal possessions and savings. Spouses and children do not automatically receive everything in the deceased&rsquo;s estate.<br /><br />There is a strict pecking order under the Act for deciding who gets what. Spouses get a rough treatment by the intestacy rules.<br /><br />Examples:<br /><br />The Deceased leaves a spouse but no children so the spouse receives:<br /><br /><ul><li>All the personal chattels - such a furniture, jewellery, car, pictures etc<br /><br /></li><li>A legacy of &pound;200,000 and one half of the balance outright<br /><br /></li><li>The remaining balance then passes to various relatives according to who has survived; first to the deceased&rsquo;s parents but if not surviving then equally to surviving brothers and sisters.<br /></li></ul>The Deceased leaves a spouse and children, the spouse receives:<br /><br /><ul><li>All the personal chattels<br /><br /></li><li>A legacy of &pound;125,000 and the <u>income</u> from one half of the balance<br /><br /></li><li>The rest passes to the children when they reach 18</li></ul><br />Now imagine how this can lead to problems, here are just a few of the major ones:<br /><ul><li>If the matrimonial home is in the deceased spouse&rsquo;s sole name it might need to be sold to satisfy the various family claims.<br /><br /></li><li>Inheritance Tax may be due if the value of the estate passing to relatives other then the spouse is over the nil rate band of &pound;312,000 (2008/9 limits).<br /><br /></li><li>If there are two or more children they aren&rsquo;t going to receive much unless the estate is worth at least some hundreds of thousand pounds.<br /><br /></li><li>Children inherit their share at 18 &ndash; not necessarily the best age to give sums of capital.<br /><br /></li><li>Where there aren&rsquo;t any children, having a proportion left to an older generation or remoter relatives may not be just bad tax planning, it might be leaving money to relatives with which the deceased would otherwise have no connection, possibly intentionally.<br /><br /></li><li>Beneficiaries will be the administrators of the estate &ndash; perhaps they aren&rsquo;t suitable.</li></ul><div><br />Failure to make a Will can have disastrous consequences for the family wealth, relationships and liabilities. It leaves far too much to chance and the only likely smile will be on the face of the Chancellor of the Exchequer!</div><br /><br /><strong>Make a Will. Don&rsquo;t delay. Contact you usual client contact at Bishop &amp; Sewell LLP or speak to Andrew Murray of our Private Client Department: 46 Bedford Square, London WC1B 3DP; Tel: 0207 631 4141; e-mail: <a href="mailto:amurray@bishopandsewell.co.uk">amurray@bishopandsewell.co.uk</a> <br /></strong>]]></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<title><![CDATA[LVT Update]]></title>
			<link>http://www.bishopandsewell.co.uk/news.php?id=000034</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<span class="018091013-04022008">There are some forthcoming changes to the LVT and the tribunals service generally. Read more in Mark Chick's article which appeared&nbsp;in the January&nbsp;issue of News on the Block.</span>]]></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<title><![CDATA[Smoke Gets In your Eyes]]></title>
			<link>http://www.bishopandsewell.co.uk/news.php?id=000031</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The long awaited (or dreaded) smoking ban came into force on 1 July 2007. Most employers have already implemented a ban within the general workspace, but are advised to pay attention to the following;<br /><br /><ul><li>The ban must be implemented in &lsquo;enclosed&rsquo; or &lsquo;substantially enclosed&rsquo; areas, and so partially enclosed areas in car parks etc would also be subject to the new law.<br /><br /></li><li>Pool cars must also be non-smoking<br /><br /></li><li>Employers are required to put up signs of specific size and content (including the <strong><em>correct</em></strong> non-smoking symbol!) at the entrances to doors of non-smoking buildings, and in non-smoking vehicles.<br /><br /></li><li>There is no requirement to offer smoking breaks, but where smoking was previously permitted employers may wish to consider offering an option of shorter lunch breaks, to enable smokers to take scheduled smoking breaks. As with most issues, it is advisable to record the rules in writing, and ensure enforcement, to avoid future problems. <br /><br /></li><li>Employers are required to enforce the smoking ban, and prevent smoking in areas covered by the ban, which are within their management control. Failure to comply with the law in enforcing the ban or in failing to display compliant signs may result in fines.<br /></li></ul><div><br /><br /><br /><br />For more information, contact:<br /><br />Linda Quinn<br />020 7079 2434<br /><a href="mailto:lq@bishopandsewell.co.uk">lq@bishopandsewell.co.uk</a><br /></div><br />]]></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<title><![CDATA[Buyers Beware – Don’t Get More Than You Bargained For]]></title>
			<link>http://www.bishopandsewell.co.uk/news.php?id=000030</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div>If you are acquiring a business in a transaction, and that business has employees, then you will need to be aware of the Transfer Of Undertakings (Protection of Employees) Regulations 2006 (&ldquo;TUPE&rdquo;). If the regulations are not followed, then the incoming business could find itself subject to claims by former employees of the &lsquo;outgoing&rsquo; business. This can sometimes come as quite a surprise, as in some cases the Claimant is an employee of whom you were totally unaware!<br /></div><div><br />TUPE requires the employer to consult about the transfer of the business and the potential effect of any proposed changes. It also requires that the incoming business continues to employ the staff, on the same terms and conditions.<br /></div><ul><li>Issues to consider when deciding whether TUPE applies include whether you will carry on the same activities as the previous company, whether you will acquire any goodwill, and what you will acquire in terms of assets of the old company. It will not apply to a simple share sale, where the employer remains the same company throughout.</li></ul><br /><ul><li>Before the transaction is completed, ensure that you have relevant information about how many employees there are, what they are paid, what the terms of employment are, and whether there are any potential claims from existing employees. If the previous employer failed to pay contractual bonus last year, the liability for payment could transfer to your company with the transaction!</li></ul><br /><ul><li>It is always wise to obtain an indemnity for such claims from the vendor, and have this inserted into the sale and purchase agreement. If possible, negotiate to hold back some of the purchase price until the limitation period for any obvious potential Employment Tribunal claims has passed (usually 6 months).</li></ul><br /><ul><li>Be careful about changing terms and conditions of employment &ndash; it would be wise to take legal advice, because changes could result in claims from the employees, and in any event could be void. If, for example, you changed the bonus structure, resulting in loss for the employees, you could be required to compensate, even if the employees appeared to consent to the variation. Such claims could come back to haunt the business even years into the future. There are ways in which terms can be changed, but this involves careful planning and consultation.</li></ul><br /><ul><li>The TUPE regulations automatically transfer the employees to the &lsquo;incoming&rsquo; business &ndash; whether they are wanted or not! Dismissals are possible, but again this requires consultation and careful planning as to the reasons for the dismissals, in order to avoid costly unfair dismissal claims.</li></ul><br /><ul><li>Within the confines of this article we have only addressed the issues relating to business acquisitions, but TUPE can apply where there has been no transaction to purchase a business &ndash;where a service contract (for example, an office cleaning contract) changes hands the employees would automatically transfer to become the employees of the new contractor.<br /></li></ul><div><br />This is a complex area which is an essential consideration during any transaction involving employees. We will cover other aspects of TUPE in greater detail in further issues. Should you need advice then please contact Linda Quinn, our employment specialist.<br /></div><div><br /><br /><br /><br />For more information, contact:<br /><br />Linda Quinn<br />020 7079 2434<br /><a href="mailto:lq@bishopandsewell.co.uk">lq@bishopandsewell.co.uk</a><br /></div>]]></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<title><![CDATA[Latest LVT developments]]></title>
			<link>http://www.bishopandsewell.co.uk/news.php?id=000023</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<br /><div>There have been changes in LVT practice and procedure relating to lease extension and freehold purchase claims. Most of these came into effect as of January 2007 but the changes relating to listing are being applied only to new cases (i.e. applications received since the start of this year). </div><br /><br /><div>Under the new procedures once an application is made the Tribunal will write to the parties acknowledging receipt of the application and will offer&nbsp;the parties (if they both agree) an opportunity for further negotiations to take place. To take advantage of this both sides&nbsp;must confirm their agreement in writing within 14 days of the Tribunal&rsquo;s request.&nbsp; If this is done, no further steps will be taken to list the matter for a&nbsp; further period of 3 months.</div><br /><br /><div>Once this period expires the tribunal will send out a listing questionnaire.&nbsp;The format of this is being expanded slightly to contain slightly more information with the intention of reducing clashes of available dates for the parties and their representatives.</div><br /><br /><div>The tribunal then&nbsp;issues directions (the steps the parties must take to get the matter ready for a final hearing). These will now include a requirement to circulate a draft lease or transfer with a timetable much earlier on in the process. This should assist in narrowing issues relating to drafting. </div><br /><br /><div>As we all know the vast majority of applications before the Tribunal settle without the need for a final hearing. However dealing with these cases causes the Tribunal a significant administrative burden. </div><br /><br /><div>The Tribunal has therefore&nbsp;indicated&nbsp;it will only vacate hearings when it is clear that all the terms of the acquisition have been agreed (i.e. in accordance with the provisions of s.24 or s.48 of the 1993 Act as appropriate).&nbsp; </div><br /><br /><div>This means that settlement must mean exactly that and the parties&rsquo; advisors must confirm that the price and the terms of the acquisition, including the lease or transfer itself, have been finalised.</div><br /><br /><div>The old practice of simply writing to the tribunal confirming that the figures have been agreed and asking them to vacate the hearing&nbsp;will therefore have to cease. </div><br /><br /><br /><br /><div>Mark Chick </div><br /><div>Bishop &amp; Sewell LLP </div><br /><div>31.1.2007</div><br /><em><br /></em><div><em>Mark Chick is a partner at Bishop &amp; Sewell LLP specialising in leasehold reform and landlord and tenant matters</em></div><br /><br /><br /><br />]]></description>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>